larger
view
table
of contents
read
an excerpt
book details
buy the book
ISBN
0-9747685-2-9
Cover
Photo by:
Jerome Bird,
Pride of Baltimore, Inc.
|
1812:
REDISCOVERING CHESAPEAKE BAY'S FORGOTTEN WAR
Author: David Healey
Original Title from Bella Rosa Books
Chapter
7
The
Burning of Havre de Grace
How a lone Irishman took on the Royal Navy
On a
sunny May afternoon nearly 189 years to the day since it was sacked and
burned by the British, the town of Havre de Grace was captured again.
"Die you English dogs!" shouted a soldier
in an elegant blue uniform. His flintlock musket fired and white smoke
rolled across the battlefield.
From the Susquehanna River, a motley crew of attackers
swarmed toward town. Some wore red coats, others the blue of British sailors.
They snapped off a few shots at the American force taking refuge in a
"fort" made of stockade fencing that looked suspiciously as
if it might have come from Home Depot. However, the sharpened sticks or
abatis jutting from the ground at an angle and ending about throat-height
appeared very realistic and nasty. Not something you would want to impale
yourself on at a dead run, even at a re-enactment.
"Boo to the British!" yelled one of the spectators
sitting on a straw bale and watching from behind a streamer of yellow
caution tape that ringed the battlefield.
The Americans fired a ragged volley from their makeshift
fort and two of the fattest attackers flopped down to play dead, then
lay wheezing as the attack pressed on. "They just didn't want to
run all that way," one woman in the crowd wisecracked, and laughter
rippled through the spectators.
As re-enactments go, it was not terribly realistic,
but with a little imagination it was possible to envision what the attack
early on the morning of May 4, 1813, was like as the British landed to
ransack and burn the town. In recent years Havre de Grace has been holding
an annual re-enactment on the anniversary of the town's destruction at
British hands.
It became clear from watching the British recapture
Havre de Grace that the difference between War of 1812 re-enacting and
Civil War re-enacting is like the contrast between golf and rugby. Civil
War re-enactors tend to be an intense bunch when it comes to their mock
battles, while the older War of 1812 crowd takes a more casual approach.
They stroll toward the enemy where Civil War soldiers would be charging
ahead and screaming a rebel yell. This difference continued over into
the general appearance of the 1812 troops. The sixty or so re-enactors
at Havre de Grace were mostly duffers in their fifties or beyond. Some
of the more fit and trim men looked sharp in their tailored uniforms,
while others were so well-fed that in a real battle they would have made
invitingly large targets. They were all good sports to be on the battlefield
in their scratchy wool uniforms for the benefit of the crowd that had
come to watch and learn about the War of 1812.
Most of the town's defenders in 1813 actually were older
men. Back in the early 1800s all males between the ages of eighteen and
forty-five were required to have a firearm and be familiar with its use.
All the younger men from Havre de Grace were off defending Baltimore,
so this left the over-the-hill crowd back home to stand against crack
troops as best they could.
The town was put to the torch in 1813 with a substantial
property loss. The attack was surprisingly bloodless, probably because
most of the fifty or sixty American militia soldiers ran after a few shots
were exchanged. According to Vincent Vaise, a national park ranger from
Fort McHenry who narrated the re-enactment, the British lost three killed
and two wounded. One American was killed when he was beheaded by a Congreve
rocket.
"You can imagine how demoralizing that must have
been to his comrades," Vaise said. "We couldn't recreate those
rockets here today, but they were truly the terror weapons of their day."
Vaise made more than one reference to terrorism, making
the connection between September 11, 2001, and Admiral Cockburn's attacks
on the Chesapeake Bay. "The attack on Havre de Grace may seem like
a long time ago but after September 11 the idea of an invasion by an enemy
seems far more current," Vaise told the crowd. "The emotions
felt by the people here were very much like the ones we felt upon hearing
of the attack on our nation."
Today, Havre de Grace is a pleasant waterfront town
at the point where the mighty Susquehanna River empties into the Chesapeake
Bay. The river begins its 444-mile journey at Cooperstown, New York, home
of the Baseball Hall of Fame.
Havre de Grace was given its French name by the Marquis
de Lafayette, who declared that the town should be called "beautiful
harbor." After the Revolutionary War, the streets were renamed for
heroes and battlefields: Washington, Revolution, Concord, and so on. A
bustling downtown with shops and restaurants is surrounded by several
stately homes. All in all, the town recovered from British devastation
quite nicely, while other places along the bay never seemed to regain
momentum after being put to the torch.
Havre de Grace's main attraction is the waterfront.
There are marinas and a boardwalk that provides a nice place to stroll
while taking in the scenic vistas. One end of this popular boardwalk is
anchored by an old lighthouse known as Concord Point Light.
Don't expect a lighthouse as tall and windswept as those
guarding the rocky coasts of Maine or the shoals of Cape Hatteras. This
one was scaled to the Chesapeake Bay rather than the sea. Built in 1827,
Concord Point Light is thirty-six feet tall, with whitewashed walls nearly
four feet thick at the base. The structure is built of granite from the
nearby town of Port Deposit just upriver on the Susquehanna.
Standing at the water's edge, it is worth taking a moment
to get one's bearings. Just visible in the haze to the southeast are the
cliffs of Turkey Point at Elk Neck State Park. Admiral Cockburn's fleet
would have been anchored off Turkey Point and was probably just discernable
from town if the weather was clear.
A monument at the base of the lighthouse features a
badly weathered cannon set into a chunk of Port Deposit granite. A bronze
plaque honors John O'Neill for his defense of the city. It adds that his
daughter, Matilda, obtained her father's release from Cockburn's ship
after he was captured. Cockburn supposedly gave her a gold snuffbox. The
plaque also mentions that the citizens of Philadelphia later presented
O'Neill with a sword for his heroism. Another historical marker at the
water's edge notes that O'Neill manned a gun battery on high ground nearby.
O'Neill's stubborn defense of Havre de Grace is one
of the town's great legends. With the British prowling on the bay, there
had been a general alarm on May 2 and the local militia turned out, but
the citizens' martial fervor quickly waned when the British did not appear.
The attack early on May 3 caught the townspeople by
surprise. According to an account published in the Baltimore Sun
in 1959 and written by Catherine O'Neill Gunther, great-granddaughter
of the man who became the hero of the battle, the British launched their
attack with a fifteen-minute bombardment by nineteen barges. Rockets exploded
and shells burst overhead. That terrifying show of firepower was enough
to discourage any serious resistance from the local militia.
O'Neill, however, was not scared off so easily. He was
a nailmaker in town and a militia lieutenant. O'Neill, born in Ireland
in 1769, most likely had a genetic hatred of the British.
After the other defenders ran away, O'Neill single-handedly
manned the artillery battery near where the lighthouse now stands. According
to his great-granddaughter, it was called the "Potato Battery"
because of the size of the iron shot fired by the two six-pound and one
nine-pound guns.
As rockets burst around him and grapeshot clawed the
air, O'Neill kept on firing at the British until he was injured when his
cannon recoiled before he could get out of the way. Undaunted, O'Neill
limped back to town and tried to rally a few of the militia. He used his
musket as a crutch, stopping now and then to take a shot at the British.
O'Neill gave the following account in a letter,
I retreated down to
town, and joined Mr. Barnes, of the nail manufactory, with a musket, and
fired on the barges while we had ammunition, and then retreated to the
common, where I kept waving my hat to the militia who had run away, to
come to our assistance, but they proved cowardly and would not come back.
His
somewhat madcap defense may have saved him from being killed outright
by a British bayonet. The Redcoats took him prisoner and carried him back
to Admiral Cockburn's flagship, HMS Maidstone.
The British looted the town and set houses on fire.
About forty of the town's sixty houses burned to the ground. American
accounts describe a nightmarish scene in which the British smash everything
in sight. The invaders shot pigs and other animals, leaving them dead
or maimed in the streets. The British "outraged and insulted"
women and children. Stagecoaches were destroyed, their horses cruelly
crippled. The British even shattered the windows of the town's Episcopal
church, stopping short of setting it ablaze. The Redcoats spared the home
of Commodore John Rodgers, who was busy fighting the Royal Navy for control
of the Great Lakes. His home was left standing as a matter of professional
courtesy and serves today as a barbershop.
Spoils of war were seized. Sailors and marines dismantled
several fine stages and loaded them on barges. British troops robbed travelers
on the road between Baltimore and Philadelphia.
The Niles Weekly Register newspaper railed against
Admiral Cockburn's actions, trumpeting,
Wanton outrage!
Many fled from their burning houses almost in a state of nudity, carrying
in their arms their children, clothes, &c.
The ruins of Havre de Grace shall stand as a monument
to British cruelty . . . The villain-deed has roused the honest indignation
of every man-no one pretends to justify or excuse it. It has knit the
people into a common bond for vengeance on the incendiaries.
. . . If admiral Cockburn has his secret agents in Baltimore,
we hope they may faithfully communicate to him the events of that day:
and let him, glory, if he can, in the effect that his barbarous conduct
to poor Havre de Grace has produced. The conflagration of that village
purified party in Baltimore . . . For, or, against the English, is the
only touchstone.
The attack on Havre de Grace only served to further
galvanize Maryland residents against the marauders. I even came across
a bit of anonymous doggerel from the early 1800s that lambasted the British
and Admiral Cockburn in particular.
That impious wretch
with coward voice decreed,
Defenceless domes and hallow'd fanes to dust;
Beheld, with seeming smile, the wounded bleed,
And spurr'd his bands to rapine, blood, and lust.
Vain was the widow's, vain the orphan's cry,
To touch his feelings or to sooth his rage -
Vain the fair drop that roll'd from beauty's eye,
Vain the dumb grief of supplicating age.
On board Admiral Cockburn's flagship, the future looked
grim for Lieutenant O'Neill. Any subject or former subject of the crown
who took up arms against the king was considered a traitor, subject to
death. O'Neill's teen-age daughter intervened, rowing out to Cockburn's
flagship to plead for her father's life. He gave the girl the snuffbox
and at least one account has Cockburn and O'Neill then getting drunk together
on Irish whiskey, but that seems highly unlikely. Cockburn might have
been a sucker for a pretty face, but he was not known for his hospitality
or for mixing with the lower classes of Americans and Irishmen.
There might have been a less romantic, more practical
reason why O'Neill was spared. The American government had promised to
retaliate if any naturalized citizens were hanged. A letter Cockburn received
from General Henry Miller, the American commander in Baltimore, warned
that two British prisoners would be hanged if any harm came to O'Neill.
Cockburn might not have been willing to see if the general would make
good on his threat.
O'Neill became the town's most celebrated citizen. When
Concord Point Light was built, the local hero of the War of 1812 was made
the lighthouse keeper for the rest of his life. The job also came with
a comfortable stone house for the keeper. O'Neill died in 1837 and freed
his three slaves in his will. The job of light keeper passed to his son,
John Jr., who held the post until his own death in 1863. This sinecure
then passed to John Jr.'s daughter, Esther, until 1878, and then to her
brother, Henry O'Neill. When Henry died in 1919, the job fell to his son,
Harry O'Neill. O'Neills might still be carrying up the whale oil and lighting
the lamp if the federal government had not installed an automatic electric
light in the late 1920s and eliminated the light keeper's post.
The attack on Havre de Grace may have been provoked
by the sight of a massive United States flag flying over the town. At
the conclusion of the re-enactment, a replica of the Star-Spangled Banner
that flew at Fort McHenry was unfurled. The spectators, so eager to touch
a part of the flag, rushed forward to grab the flag's edge. Standing shoulder
to shoulder they stretched the huge banner out to catch the May sunshine.
Park Ranger Vaise had brought out the flag to make a point. "We still
feel strongly about the flag today, and after the attack on September
11 the flag was a symbol that helped bring Americans together," he
said.
"Out on their ships, the British said, 'How dare
they fly that flag and flaunt the symbol of their upstart nation!' It
outraged and taunted the British and probably led to some of the excessive
damage done during the attack here. They were truly chagrined to see that
flag," Vaise said. The fate of the huge Havre de Grace flag is not
known, although it is likely the British seized it as a war trophy.
"More than a year later and fifty miles south of
here, another huge flag would fly over the city of Baltimore," Vaise
continued. "Only this time the British would not be successful in
their attack. It would be an American victory and that flag would become
a national symbol."
copyright
© 2005 David Healey
|